unit 20: convoluted flesh

Convoluted Flesh

The convoluted (i.e. overlapped, intertwined and blurred) nature of contemporary architectural design, as we understand it, goes beyond the functions of opulence and intricacy, of technique and simulation, of module and optimisation. It invokes something ranking above notions of beauty, style, and elegance – it evokes the sublime, the blissful and the mysterious.

Simultaneously, our understanding of Flesh in architecture stands in opposition to the common, yet reductive metaphor of skin as a flat and thin membrane. In a time when a lot of the mainstream architectural discourse is essentially surface-bound – risking flattening and disembodying the architectural ‘skin’ ever more, the aim of Convoluted Flesh, on the contrary, is to stress the urgency of a Thick Embodied Flesh.

Our endeavour is then to establish a debate in which experimentation, technology and progress does neither exclude the intuitive and poetic freedom of designers as truly creative thinkers, nor the inherent relationship between the user and the depth of the architectural flesh. Hence, we consider a poetic, as well as ‘corpological’ approach that complement a typological, topological and ecological understanding of architecture. At the same time, we pursue an approach that develops from inside out, involving experiential qualities, inhabitation and use.

The research developed in Unit 20 spirals away from the apparently unquestioned and rather predictable version of what we observe as the contemporary emergence of a new ‘digital modernism’: the unspecified ‘whitewash’ of 3D surfaces, the universal Sachlichkeit (objectiveness) of parametric design techniques, and the mechanistic concept of the computer as a purely generative utensil. In turn, Unit 20 has formed a particular interest in the individual’s eccentric, yet informed understanding of architecture. By looking into technological advances within a wide range sciences and art, manufacturing technologies and interdisciplinary work methodologies, students are encouraged to develop a two-year individual research. Their work proposes a synthetic model of architecture that convolutes the ecological with the poetic, the visionary with the historic, as well as the ornamental with the tectonic.

Sublime ecologies, or ecologies of the sublime?

-unit20 blog
-barlett unit 20
-barlett unit 20:08-09 convoluted flesh

Tags: , , , ,

Categories: Academia, Research


studying: architecture design


Connect with archimorph and help grow the network.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: